Established back in 2002 by the Main Street Vegas Group, this online gambling house holds no valid license. Find out more about Slots Plus!
Las Vegas Vibes at First Sight
If an online casino with genuine Las Vegas digital vibes ever existed, it’s this one — Slots Plus. Flashy and bright-colored, this casino seems very appealing the first time you visit it. The layout is bright purple, and you can easily access every section of the casino since everything is arranged in a simple way. So, our first impression — this digital gambling establishment gives us some very positive vibes. However, (there must always be a ‘however’), not everything is that pink and sparkly.
The flashy and appealing surface made us investigate every part of this casino thoroughly. In 2002, Slots Plus was established by the Main Street Vegas Group Casinos. RealTime Gaming supports this casino, and their games offer is one of the largest in the gaming industry. As for the license, Slots Plus Casino is supposedly under the jurisdiction of Costa Rica. However, we had to look for this piece of information elsewhere.
Namely, the information about the license isn’t displayed either on the home page or in the terms and conditions for that matter. So, how did we get the information? We did ask the customer support, but they wiggled their way out of answering. Therefore, we searched for some mainstream gambling portals and found the information, but is this info true? Probably not. The issue with this casino is the fact that it’s a part of the Main Street Vegas Group Casinos. This group is known for enforcing some shady dormancy terms. The angry players issued many complaints during the first half of the last year.
Terrible Dormancy Policy Examples
One of the highlighted examples of this was the case when an individual player won $18 thousand. The operators decided to pay the player out after six months. Unfortunately, the player received the amount of $12 thousand because the management of Slots Plus decided to keep $6 thousand. The action was justified by the fact that the user didn’t play in the preceding six months.
You see, this issue is problematic because of two things. What kind of incentive did the casino provide to the player to continue playing with the goal to win more cash, when the operators took so long to pay out the first time? And the second issue is the fact that this policy makes it possible for the casino to stall their payouts until they have the right to void the winnings and delete the account.
Throughout the second half of the decade, there have been numerous complaints, all of them regarding the postponed or non-existent payouts. So, what good are the attractive design, progressive jackpots, free spins, MST gift cards, deposit bonuses, and other Slots Plus offers when you cannot claim the winnings? Here’s the answer — they are no good.